Tome

#31

More than slides, creates 'storytelling'. Cool word to say it makes presentations that look like interactive websites. Lots of smoke, but the roast looks good.

Is it easy to use?

Easy to use, even if the ‘editing’ interface is a bit more complex than Gamma. A 9.0 out of 10.

How long to learn?

Few minutes. Write a prompt and it does everything. Very similar to Gamma in approach. Mastered in hours.

How efficient is it?

Very efficient at creating a ‘cool draft’. Less so if you need to customize every detail. An 8.5 out of 10.

Is it worth it?

The ‘Yes (Limited)’ plan is ok to try. Pro (from $16/mo) is pricier than Gamma, but does different things. (Value: 8.5/10).

Can I use it Commercially?

Yes. Green light, you can make money with it. But if you get sued, don’t blame me. (Always check ToS).

In a Nutshell (Verdict)

More ‘storytelling’ than ‘slides’. Great for pitches that need to strike, not for boring reports. Score: 8.3/10.

Who is it for?

To anyone terrified of having to make another presentation and tired of staring at a white bullet list. It is salvation for those with zero aesthetic taste. Its fans:

  • Consultants and Salespeople: To create an impressive draft 5 minutes before the client meeting, giving the illusion of having worked on it for hours.
  • Students: To look good in exams, turning a confused idea into 10 consistent (and nice) slides without spending the night moving text boxes.
  • Managers: For weekly reports. They insert 3 points and AI generates the presentation, ready to be ignored by their boss.
  • Anyone traumatized: By 20 years of unwatchable bullet lists, blue backgrounds, and Comic Sans fonts. It is therapy.

Your slides boring? Go see if you can impress someone with a bit of smoke.