TOP 50 AI TOOLS

Jasper

#17

The robotic corporate copywriter. Trained to write 'on brand', which is the polite way of saying 'write marketing fluff that sounds professional'. Expensive, but does its dirty work.
Like to try Jasper?

Is it easy to use?

Clean interface, very focused on marketing. Lots of templates to guide you. An 8.5 out of 10.

How long to learn?

Few minutes for the first output. Days to master ‘templates’ and ‘brand voice’ so it doesn’t sound *too* much like a robot.

How efficient is it?

Very efficient for quantity. Churns out 1000 words in 5 minutes. Less efficient for quality, always requires a human pass. An 8.5 out of 10.

Is it worth it?

It’s expensive. No real free plan, just a ‘Trial’. You pay for ‘marketing’ specialization. (Value: 7.5/10).

Can I use it Commercially?

Yes. Green light, you can make money with it. But if you get sued, don’t blame me. (Always check ToS).

In a Nutshell (Verdict)

AI for those doing serious marketing. Less versatile than ChatGPT, more focused. Score: 8.5/10.

Who is it for?

To marketing teams that must produce content like there’s no tomorrow, and have run out of ideas (and soul). It is the writer for those who don’t like writing. Its employers:

  • Piece-rate Copywriters: To triple their production, vomiting 10 drafts a minute. Then they spend time ‘cleaning’ the robot’s fluff.
  • Social Media Managers: To generate 5 variants of a post in 10 seconds, hoping one goes viral.
  • ‘Corporate’ Companies: They love its ability to write in a professional, clean, competent, and totally soulless way. It is the blue uniform of writing.
  • Marketers (rich): Because Jasper costs more than ChatGPT, so it *must* be better for marketing, right? (Spoiler: it’s just more focused).

Nobody reading your marketing fluff? Let a robot write it, maybe that works.

Go to Jasper